follow-up, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings.To investigate the association of serum interleukin-11 (IL-11) with disease activity and occurrence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
One hundred and six RA patients were included, including 31 with ILD. All patients were divided into two groups according to the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), active-disease group (DAS28&gt;3.2) and target-achieved group (DAS28?3.2). Serum IL-11 was detected by ELISA. Serum autoantibodies [anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF)], inflammatory markers [C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)], and complete blood count were measured with routine methods.
Serum IL-11 was upregulated in RA patients compared with healthy controls (HC), and increased more significantly in patients with ILD (RA-ILD) than patients without ILD (RA-nonILD). In both RA-ILD and RA-nonILD patients, serum level of IL-11 was higher in the active-disease group than that in the target-achieved group. Pearson correlation analysis confirmed that IL-11 was positively correlated with DAS28. No significant correlation was found between serum level of IL-11 and ACPA or RF. IL-11 was positively correlated with ESR and CRP levels and PLT count in RA patients.
IL-11 was found to be involved in the development of arthritis and ILD in RA patients, and might constitute a potential target for the treatment of RA-ILD.
IL-11 was found to be involved in the development of arthritis and ILD in RA patients, and might constitute a potential target for the treatment of RA-ILD.Biologic drugs (bDMARD), especially TNF-α-inhibitors (TNFi), are used in refractory Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) patients. Up to 23% of patients are switched to a different bDMARD because of inefficacy. No data are available on which strategy is more efficient after TNFi failure. The aim of our study is to evaluate whether a switch or swap strategy should be preferred in TAK patients failing TNFis.
TAK patients treated with a second bDMARD after the failure of the first TNFi were identified from 3 referral centres. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/pt2977.html Patients were classified as switch if treated with a different TNFi, and swap if treated with a non-TNFi bDMARD. Baseline features were evaluated. Efficacy and safety of the second bDMARD at 6 and 12 months were assessed and a comparison between switch and swap patients was made.
Twenty-four TAK patients were identified. Eleven patients (46%) were switched and 13 patients (54%) were swapped (12 to tocilizumab, 1 to ustekinumab). Baseline features of patients in the 2 groups were comparable. At 12 months, the second bDMARD was suspended in 4 switch (36%) and in 5 swap (42%) patients. Second biologic drug survival and relapse-free survival were equivalent between the two groups at 6 and 12 months. A vascular worsening was observed in 4 switch (40%) and 2 swap (25%) patients. Severe infections, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke or cancer were recorded in no patient.
Our retrospective study suggests that in first-line TNFi failure TAK patients both switch and swap strategies can be considered suitable approaches.
Our retrospective study suggests that in first-line TNFi failure TAK patients both switch and swap strategies can be considered suitable approaches.The goal of palliative and supportive care is to improve patients' quality of life (QoL). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are the gold standard for the assessment of QoL and symptoms; however, when self-reporting is complicated, PROMs are often substituted with proxy-reported outcome measures, such as clinician-reported outcome measures. The objective of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) for staff (IPOS-Staff).
This multicenter, cross-sectional observational study was conducted concurrently with the validation of the IPOS for patients (IPOS-Patient). Japanese adult patients with cancer and their staff were recruited. We assessed the characteristics of the patients and staff members, missing values, prevalence, and total IPOS scores. For the analysis of criterion validity, intra-rater, and inter-rater reliability, we calculated intraclass correlations (ICCs).
One hundred and forty-three patients cs fair validity and reliability for physical items but poor for psycho-social items. By defining the context and objectives of its use and interpretation, the IPOS-Staff can be a useful tool for measuring outcomes in adult patients with cancer who cannot complete self-evaluations.Chronic rhinosinusitis patients with biofilms cultured from their sinonasal cavity have greater symptom burden and risk of recalcitrant disease. A number of non-antibiotic, 'anti-biofilm' treatments exist which show anti-biofilm properties in preclinical studies. There is little evidence evaluating their impact on clinical symptom scores in chronic rhinosinusitis.
A systematic review was performed to assess the literature regarding the efficacy of non-steroid, non-antibiotic, anti-biofilm specific topical therapies in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. The primary outcome assessed was change in validated patient reported outcome measures before and after anti-biofilm treatment.
Thirteen studies assessing the effect of anti-biofilm therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis through validated patient-reported outcome measures were included. Seven different anti-biofilm specific therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis were identified. None of the seven anti-biofilm therapies was identified as being confidently efficacious beyond placebo. Only one therapy (intranasal xylitol) showed a statistically significant reduction in symptom scores compared with placebo in more than one trial.
Robust evidence supporting the use of various anti-biofilm therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis is lacking. Further high quality, human, in vivo trials studying the effect of anti-biofilm therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis are needed to address the deficiencies of the current evidence base.
Robust evidence supporting the use of various anti-biofilm therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis is lacking. Further high quality, human, in vivo trials studying the effect of anti-biofilm therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis are needed to address the deficiencies of the current evidence base.